Why flattering Trump is now the go-to diplomatic move

There’s a pattern in many of President Trump’s interactions with other world leaders. You might call it “the art of the praise” — and they are serving heaping amounts of flattery.

When Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the U.K. paid a visit to the White House in February, he brought a letter tucked in his jacket pocket. It was a formal invitation from King Charles III for a rare second state visit, presented to Trump with rhetorical flourish in the Oval Office.

“This is really special. This has never happened before,” Starmer said. “This is uecedented, and I think that just symbolizes the strength of the relationship between us. So this is a very special letter.”

Then, in July, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu brought Trump another letter, one he said he had sent to the Nobel Committee.

“It’s nominating you for the Peace Prize, which is well deserved and you should get it,” Netanyahu said to Trump. Trump has long coveted the Nobel Peace Prize, and responded with a “wow.”

Two days later at another White House event, the leaders of multiple African nations concurred when prompted by a friendly journalist. Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, the leaders said.

The president has been receptive to both honors, thanking Starmer and Netanyahu. But there’s strategy in the flattery, and it looks much different from Trump’s first White House term. During his first term, world leaders were skeptical and distant of Trump’s authority. Now, during his second, they’re more obsequious.

And Trump isn’t just getting more praise, he’s getting results, said Volker. He points to the pledges from NATO alliance members to spend 5% of their GDP on defense by 2035, which Trump helped secure at the NATO summit in the Hague in June.

“And some of that is Europeans stepping up to do what they should have been doing already,” said Volker.

The White House points to the number of leaders who have come to Washington to meet with Trump, including repeat visits. The total is up to 23 so far, with many of them coming to the White House in hopes of securing a favorable trade deal with lower tariffs. That is far more than visited Presidents Biden and Obama during their first six months.

There is another explanation. These leaders have “taken the measure of the man,” said Ivo Daalder. He is a senior fellow at the Belfer Center at Harvard and served as U.S. ambassador to NATO during the Obama administration.

He says Trump clearly wants to be seen as a winner, as a singularly important figure who achieves things that others can’t.

“So, flattery and saying he is the best, that he is the only person who could have achieved this outcome at this summit, is meant to first and foremost keep him on side,” Daalder says.

Last weekend, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made sure to compliment Trump before hashing out the final details of a trade agreement, calling him a “tough negotiator and deal maker.” Then she took a page right out of Trump’s playbook.

“If we are successful I think it would be the biggest deal each of us has ever struck,” von der Leyen said. Later, when they announced that a deal had, in fact, been struck, Trump proudly echoed von der Leyen’s language about it being the ‘biggest deal ever made.’

As with many of the trade deals Trump has announced, many of the particulars with the EU-U.S. agreement remain quite murky. But for Trump they are all wins, and he, as deal maker in chief, is the central protagonist.

This is another shift from the first term, when Daalder says many leaders tried to work with Trump’s secretaries of state or national security advisers. They were seen as “guard rails” or aides who could prevail upon Trump to get a certain outcome. But Daalder says that largely didn’t work. Trump was and is the decider, and foreign leaders and diplomats have now figured that out.

“He alone decides. And that means you have to deal with Trump in order to get any deal,” said Daalder. “And the only way to get a good deal is to flatter him.”

In the case of NATO, the flattery was fruitful. Trump has long been doubtful of the mutual defense alliance. Before their most recent summit, NATO Chief Mark Rutte sent a fawning text to Trump, which the president then posted on his social media site, Truth Social.

“You are flying into another big success in The Hague this evening,” Rutte wrote. “You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done.”

Getting the NATO alliance members to agree to spend 5% of their GDP on defense was a major win for Trump and the alliance, which Rutte reiterated when the two were face to face.

“It’s absolutely true,” said Rutte. “I want to state here, without President Trump this would not have happened.”

This was the same appearance where Rutte appeared to refer to Trump as “daddy,” which the president and his merch-making-machine ran with.

“I think he likes me if he doesn’t, I’ll let you know,” Trump said of Rutte, when a reporter asked about the daddy reference. “He did it very affectionately. ‘Daddy, you’re my daddy.'”

This episode also proved that “shamelessness truly is a superpower” said Justin Logan, director of defense and foreign policy studies at the CATO Institute. He sees Trump’s leadership style as very personal and personalized, at times even “primal.”

“Nothing is forever. You can go from [Trump’s] nice list to the naughty list and back with some alacrity,” said Logan. “That’s the really unnerving thing. So I think the lesson here will be, keep larding on the praise, even if it doesn’t feel so great.”

For some of these leaders, there have been political consequences at home. In many countries, Trump remains an unpopular figure and leaders have taken heat for their over-the-top praise, working to win him over.